Certificate of Insurance Tracking SaaS for Contractors and Property Managers
Software that collects, reads, and monitors subcontractor certificates of insurance so general contractors and property managers stop absorbing uninsured risk.
The problem
General contractors, property managers, and franchisors must collect certificates of insurance (COIs) from every subcontractor and vendor, check limits and endorsements, and chase renewals. Most do it with spreadsheets and a shared inbox. Expired or non-compliant COIs mean the hiring party eats the claim, and audits get ugly. Manual review is slow, inconsistent, and quietly expensive.
Why now
Document AI now reads ACORD 25 forms, schedules of endorsements, and policy declarations reliably enough for a human to verify in seconds rather than minutes. At the same time insurance costs and litigation exposure in construction and property have risen, so compliance teams are under pressure to prove every vendor was covered on the day work happened.
Who pays
Mid-market general contractors (20 to 500 subs), commercial property managers, franchisors, and staffing firms in the US, Canada, UK, and Australia who currently track COIs in Excel.
How it makes money
SaaS tiers by number of tracked vendors, roughly $200 to $2,000 per month, plus an onboarding fee for backfilling an existing vendor list. Optional per-document verification credits for spiky volumes.
Market & demand
Order-of-magnitude: hundreds of thousands of contractors and property managers across these four markets track vendor insurance. Even 300 accounts at $600 per month is a mid-seven-figure ARR business.
COI tracking used to be sold as an add-on service by brokers. It is now a standalone software category with venture-backed players, which validates demand but also means you must win on niche depth or price rather than raw feature count.
Verify before you commit:
- Contractor and property manager counts (US Census County Business Patterns, ONS UK, ABS Australia)
- Pricing pages of myCOI, Evident, TrustLayer, and Jones
- Construction insurance and litigation cost trends (industry broker reports)
- ACORD form standards documentation
SWOT
Strengths
- Clear, quantifiable pain with an obvious cost of failure
- Sticky once a vendor list is loaded
- AI extraction gives real cost advantage over manual review services
Weaknesses
- Long sales cycles into risk-averse buyers
- You are not the insurer, so you can only flag, not fix, coverage gaps
- Extraction accuracy must be very high to be trusted
Opportunities
- Niche verticals such as trades, events, or logistics that incumbents ignore
- Broker channel partnerships as a white-label offering
- Expand into W-9, licence, and safety-certificate tracking
Threats
- Well-funded incumbents cutting price
- Brokers bundling COI tracking free with placement
- Buyers deciding a spreadsheet is good enough
Competition & the gap
myCOI, TrustLayer, Evident ID, Jones, Bcomply, plus broker-provided tracking services and generic spreadsheet workflows.
The wedge: Incumbents target large enterprises with heavy implementations. A self-serve, fast-onboarding product for the mid-market contractor with a vendor list in a spreadsheet is underserved, especially outside the US.
Go-to-market
Pick one vertical (for example commercial roofing or multifamily property management), publish a free COI compliance audit tool that scores a sample of uploaded certificates, and convert audits into paid tracking.
First 10 customers: Offer a free backfill of the first 50 vendor COIs for 5 design partners found through trade associations and local contractor groups. Show them how many are expired or short on limits, then charge to keep it that way.
How to set it up
- 1Interview 15 contractors and property managers about their current COI process
- 2Build the extraction pipeline for ACORD 25 and equivalent UK and AU certificate formats
- 3Build the compliance rules engine (required limits, additional insured, waiver of subrogation)
- 4Add automated vendor chase emails and renewal reminders
- 5Run 5 free backfill audits and convert to paid
- 6Add broker referral partnerships as a second channel
How to validate it
Design partners load their full vendor list unprompted, extraction accuracy stays above the level where a human trusts it, compliance rate in customer accounts visibly climbs, and customers ask for API access into their project management system.
Key risks
- You must be explicit that you are a tracking and document tool, not an insurance broker or adviser. Do not interpret coverage or advise on adequacy of limits without a licensed partner, because insurance advice is regulated in the US (state DOI), UK (FCA), and Australia (ASIC)
- Extraction errors that let a non-compliant vendor through create real liability, so terms of service and errors and omissions cover matter
- Incumbents with deep pockets can undercut on price
Your moats
- A tuned extraction model on messy real-world certificates
- Vertical-specific compliance rule templates
- Vendor network effects as subs get pre-verified across multiple customers
Tools & inspiration
Companies in this space: TrustLayer, myCOI, Evident ID, Jones, Bcomply
FAQ
Found your idea? Here's how to build & launch it
The two steps most founders get stuck on, made simple.
Build your MVP without a developer
Form your US company
Not quite your fit?
Answer a few questions and we'll match you to vetted ideas for your budget, skills, and country.
Find my idea